Tag Archives: Lent

Trust (3rd Sunday in Lent, 3/8/2026)

Readings

Have you noticed how our Old Testament readings have been circling around the issue of trust? Two weeks ago, the first Sunday in Lent, Adam and Eve, with the snake in the garden saying “You will not die; for God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Gen 3:4-5). God is selfish, unworthy of your trust. Last week, God to Abram and Sarai “Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you” (Gen 12:1)—and they trust, they go. And today’s lesson: the people in the middle of nowhere, without water. “Why did you bring us out of Egypt, to kill us and our children and livestock with thirst?” (Exo 17:3). Trust, front and center.

Today’s psalm recalls that moment, urges us not to repeat it: “Harden not your hearts, / as your forebears did in the wilderness, / at Meribah, and on that day at Massah, / when they tempted me.”

It would be easier if trust could be sorted out in calm moments, not, say, in the middle of nowhere with no Kwik Trip on the horizon. Or not, say, in the middle of Roman-occupied Galilee. Or not, say, here and now. Recall what we were hearing just before entering Lent:

“Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy.
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.” (Mat 5:7-9)

Do we trust enough to risk living like that or, as it were, pick up swords with the Zealots, signal that we’re the right sort with the Pharisees, slither up to Empire with the Sadducees? Our Ash Wednesday liturgy spoke of “the need which all Christians continually have to renew their repentance and faith,” and here we are.

What might help us with this renewal?

Paul recalls Jesus’ self-offering: “But God proves his love for us in that while we still were sinners Christ died for us.” I’m all for impartial judges, but our culture’s picture of God as impartial judge often does more harm than good. God in love called Abram and Sarai. In God’s love Christ died for the ungodly. God really wants the project started with Abram and Sarai to succeed: “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Gen 12:3). To say that God is bending over backwards for it to succeed would be an understatement.

As the rabbis and Paul picked up, there’s a hint of that in our first reading: “I will be standing there in front of you on the rock at Horeb. Strike the rock, and water will come out of it, so that the people may drink.” Is Moses striking the rock without striking the Lord? In any case, the rabbis figured that rock accompanied the people in the wilderness, and so Paul writes: “For they drank from the spiritual rock that followed them, and the rock was Christ” (1Cor 10:4). Perhaps our psalm is also recalling that: “let us shout for joy to the Rock of our salvation.”

There are many reasons to come together regularly, one being that our common worship nurtures our capacity for trust. The Great Story from Genesis to Revelation, our liturgy, shared across the globe and—in its essentials—across the centuries, Jesus again feeding us with his own Body and Blood: these renew our capacity to trust this God, to respond humanly, humanely, to our world.

Come, let us sing to the Lord;
let us shout for joy to the Rock of our salvation.
Let us come before his presence with thanksgiving
and raise a loud shout to him with psalms.

The lectionary accompanies these readings with Jesus’ conversation with a Samaritan woman at a well. It contrasts with last week’s conversation with Nicodemus. Nicodemus has the more impressive religious resume; Jesus seems to get further with the Samaritan woman. That might give us pause.

As in the wilderness, water is again the presenting issue. Jesus: “but those who drink of the water that I will give them will never be thirsty. The water that I will give will become in them a spring of water gushing up to eternal life.” Shades of that rock that followed the people!

I wonder if the conversation doesn’t circle back to that theme of trust we noticed. The woman does not appear to trust easily, and has some skill in verbal sparring. Jesus too is not unskilled, and at the end of the conversation the woman’s at a different place than she was at the beginning. “Come and see a man who told me everything I have ever done! He cannot be the Messiah, can he?”

We’ve all had experiences that encourage us to avoid trusting. Avoid trusting: that can end up, effectively, as a life goal. But unless we swap reality for illusion, it’s a non-starter. We’re still in the wilderness; we still need water. And it’s not a matter of one bottle, but of a continual communal pattern. Notice how ‘trust’ and ‘hope’ are virtual synonyms in Paul’s words: we “boast in our hope of sharing the glory of God. And not only that, but we also boast in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not disappoint us, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts.” It’s trust that allows the story to continue, so that the pouring of God’s love (there’s the water again) is not the end of the story, but continues in that love irrigating our choices, our actions.

“Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy.
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.”

“[T]he need which all Christians continually have to renew their repentance and faith.” That Samaritan woman, not the only one profiting from a conversation with Jesus. What conversations might Jesus have with us? How, during Lent, might we make time for these?

On losing and saving one’s life (2nd Sunday in Lent, 2/25/2024)

Readings

At about the same time that Abraham and Sarah were in Canaan, there lived in Egypt a bureaucrat named Sinuhe. Through circumstances not of his choosing he ended up spending time in Canaan. Eventually he got back to Egypt; here’s a section from his memoirs describing that happy return:

I was placed in the house of a Royal Son. There was noble equipment in it, a bathroom and painted devices of the horizon; costly things of the Treasury were in it. Garments of Royal stuff were in every chamber, unguent and the fine oil of the King and of the courtiers whom he loves; and every serving-man made busy with his task. Years were caused to pass away from my flesh, I was shaved and my hair was combed. A burden was given over to the desert, and clothing to the Sandfarers. And I was clad in soft linen, and anointed with fine oil; by night I lay upon a bed. I gave up the sand to them that dwell therein, and oil of wood to him who smears himself with it.

It’s an unexpected window on what must have been Abraham’s experience, moving from the urban comforts of Ur and Haran to the frontier area west of the Jordan River. He had moved there in response to God’s command and promise of land, posterity, and blessing. He arrived; he waited, and waited, and waited. Months turned into years, years into decades, and still he owned no land, and had no children.

I wonder what advice we would have given Abraham. I wonder what advice I would have given Abraham. At what point do you throw in your cards and walk away? We remember Abraham and hope to be counted among his true sons and daughters because he didn’t walk away. He was still there when God Almighty showed up after his 99th birthday, confirmed the earlier promises by a formal covenant (treaty), and announced that within a year Abraham and Sarah would be changing diapers.

Abraham would have understood Jesus’ words: “If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.” What else do you call leaving Ur & Haran for the outback, and staying for decades supported by nothing more than a promise?

“For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the gospel, will save it.” What was true of Abraham was true of Jesus as well. Abraham left Mesopotamia; Jesus left heaven. As that ancient hymn puts it:

who, though he was in the form of God,
did not regard equality with God
as something to be exploited,
but emptied himself,
taking the form of a slave,
being born in human likeness.
And being found in human form,
he humbled himself
and became obedient to the point of death—
even death on a cross.

Jesus does not ask of us anything he’s not already asked of himself.

“If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the gospel, will save it.” The Ash Wednesday service invited us to self-examination and repentance, prayer, fasting, and self-denial, and here we are.

“Follow me.” Also today folk sometimes experience Jesus calling them pretty directly to far-off places: Ur to Haran to Canaan. Usually, it’s a matter of doing the best one can to let Jesus’ life flow in ours in the midst of our responsibilities, to offer up lives whose faithfulness will give God joy.

It’s easy to hear Jesus’ words as unreasonable demand: deny oneself…lose one’s life. How might we think about that?

For starters, Jesus’ words echo a truth we’ve already met in other areas of life: any serious project requires self-denial. If I want to learn a musical instrument, or a sport, or a craft, I have to set aside time, time that I may want to spend doing something else. Or take a more serious project: becoming a parent or a spouse. Here we start out by signing a pile of blank checks. And then the checks begin to come in, some small, some large.

Our culture, of course, does not help us much here. Daily we’re told that the highest good is our individual self-fulfillment, and that our duty to self-fulfillment trumps any other commitments we’ve made along the way.

When we turn to Jesus, the temptation is very strong to understand the Christian way as another means of self-fulfillment. Fortunately, we have 20 Centuries’ worth of experience to remind us of why this is a bad idea. In pre-Reformation England, for example, it was necessary to set a limit on the size of the bishop’s entourage —cooks, falconers, hunting dogs, etc— during Episcopal visitations. At the popular level, a great deal of the energy that fueled the 16th Century reformations was anger over this sort of clerical abuse of position.

Not that we have to wear bishops’ purple to participate. As disciples, we naturally try to save our lives. Here each of us face our own challenges. I, for instance, can be very jealous of what I call “my time,” so part of parenting involved the repeated challenge to be generous with time. Again, there have been times when I’ve found myself in a desert, and the temptation has been very strong to throw in the cards and walk away. Lent is a time to reflect on these particular challenges, and again ask for God’s grace to respond to them.

Now, a warning. There has been a strong tradition in our culture that values men’s selves more than women’s selves. Women are supposed to deny themselves to serve men; men are supposed to assert themselves. Jesus’ words are horribly misunderstood if they’re heard as supporting that tradition. In the Bible’s vision both men and women bear God’s image, both are called to be stewards of the world’s resources. Jesus has no interest in asking us to deny a self we have not yet learned to value.

To return to our theme, from the perspective of God’s project, Jesus’ words are absolutely necessary because the alternative —discipleship as self-aggrandizement— is so damaging to the Church, so damaging to our common life.

Follow me. Responding to that call may mean long stretches in the wilderness; it will mean a continual struggle against co-opting that call into another means of self-defined self-fulfillment. Friday mornings we pray “grant that we, walking in the way of the cross, may find it none other than the way of life and peace” and in quite unexpected ways God responds.

But there is a deeper logic to Jesus’ words than simply avoiding the Kingdom’s getting co-opted. We assume that we know who we are. So of course we’re in a perfect position to chart the path to our own fulfillment. “Captain of my ship, master of my soul.”

But spouses and parents know that as they give themselves to these roles they enter a voyage of self-discovery. Even more so the way of discipleship: in the process of following Jesus I discover who I am.

In an old Hassidic story, a rabbi receives a vision of the Gate of Heaven with many people outside. A voice of great beauty is calling out names, and people are entering the gate. But there are more names than people entering, so the rabbi asks an angel standing nearby, “Where are the people whose names are called and aren’t entering?” “They are here” —replied the angel— “but they do not know their own names. Only when they learn their own names will they be able to recognize them when they are called.”

As we continue to respond to Jesus’ call, we continue to learn who we are, we get better—God willing—at recognizing our own names.