Author Archives: Fr. Tom McAlpine

Unknown's avatar

About Fr. Tom McAlpine

Fr. Tom is a semi-retired priest in the Episcopal Church living in Fitchburg, Wisconsin.

Re the Daily Office Readings May 23 Anno Domini 2020

The Readings: Numbers 11:16-17, 24-29; Ephesians 2:11-22; Matthew 7:28––8:4

(From today until Pentecost—Sunday excepted—the Lectionary offers a course reading in Matthew 7-9.)

With the Numbers reading we pivot towards the arrival of God’s Breath/Spirit/Wind at Pentecost, now just over a week away.

In a traditional Christian reading of Genesis 1 we first meet God’s Spirit brooding over a dark and chaotic world. Seven days later, all “very good.” (This might set us up for unrealistic expectations unless we recall that human decisions were not involved.) We might wonder: what else does this Spirit do? For what else does the Spirit come? Our readings suggest the start of a sketch of an answer; see what you think.

In Numbers, Moses is faced with a restive, suspicious, dangerous crowd. God’s Spirit will fall on the seventy elders to help him get the people to a better place.

In Ephesians the author celebrates God’s project of uniting Jew and Gentile, groups that at that time and place had little love lost between them. For that project to have any chance of success: God’s Breath.

In Matthew… Remember that Jesus healed in many ways, from using spit to make mud, to long-distance. If ever there was a time for long-distance healing, keeping up boundaries (social distancing!) it was in dealing with this demanding leper (recall Leviticus). And Jesus “stretched out his hand and touched him.” How can we be empowered to follow Jesus’ example, blowing through the cultural, political, social barriers that divide us? Again, God’s Wind.

From the dark, chaotic world at the beginning of our story, through Ezekiel’s valley filled with very dry bones and the Day of Pentecost, to our day, not lacking in darkness and chaos: Come, Holy Spirit; Veni Sancte Spiritus!

The verses to the linked song:

  1. Come, Holy Spirit, from heaven shine forth with your glorious light.
  2. Come, Father of the poor, come, generous Spirit, come, light of our hearts.
  3. Come from the four winds, O Spirit, come breath of God, disperse the shadows over us, renew and strengthen your people.
  4. Most kindly warming light! Enter the inmost depths of our hearts, for we are faithful to you. Without your presence, we have nothing worthy, nothing pure.
  5. You are our only comforter, peace of the soul. In the heat you shade us; in our labor you refresh us, and in trouble, you are our strength.
  6. On all who put their trust in you, and receive you in faith, shower all your gifts. Grant that they may grow in you and persevere to the end, give them lasting joy.

Postscript to May 21 Anno Domini 2020

Flannery O’Connor: “I write because I don’t know what I think until I read what I say.”

It is too easy for the darkness to be overwhelming. The good news is that that doesn’t stop us praying (Psalm 59; 88). And, equally important, without going all Pangloss/Pollyanna, we can make choices re where we direct our attention. Retrospectively, the May 21 post was also an exercise in directing the attention too much to the darkness. Not that the darkness isn’t real and profoundly destructive. But it is disproportionate with our world’s bright beginning and brighter future, as witnessed in the Feast of the Ascension. Our rector, Miranda Hassett, posted this hymn yesterday; it’s worth reposting.

And have the bright immensities received our risen Lord,
where light-years frame the Pleiades and point Orion’s sword?
Do flaming suns his footsteps trace through corridors sublime,
the Lord of interstellar space and Conqueror of time?

The heaven that hides him from our sight knows neither near nor far;
an altar candle sheds its light as surely as a star:
and where his loving people meet to share the gift divine,
there stands he with unhurrying feet; there heavenly splendors shine.

Re the Daily Office Readings May 22 Anno Domini 2020

The Readings: 1 Samuel 2:1-10; Ephesians 2:1-10; Matthew 7:21-27

These readings for the day after the Feast of the Ascension invite multiple readings. On the one hand, celebration, in which even “Land of Hope and Glory” (see yesterday’s blog) has a place. Hannah (whose song is the template for Mary’s song, the Magnificat) did not celebrate in vain; the Gospel is transforming Jewish and Gentile lives in the capital of the Roman province of Asia; in a world in which destructive storms are inevitable, it is possible to build well-grounded lives.

On the other hand, Lenten self-examination. It turns out that the congregation addressed in Ephesians is typical of congregations in other times and places, firmly in the “Please be patient, God isn’t finished with me yet” category. (The author, pleading [?]: “For once you were darkness, but now in the Lord you are light. Live as children of light” [5:8; italics mine].) Hannah and Mary, time-traveling to that congregation (or ours): would they be encouraged? And Jesus in the third reading (expanded to include v.21, the beginning of the thought): He loves us too much to be satisfied with “Lord, Lord.” Where do we need to share His dissatisfaction?

Re the Daily Office Readings May 21 Anno Domini 2020

Okefenokee Swamp Park. From Carol Highsmith’s America.

The Readings: Daniel 7:9-14; Hebrews 2:5-18; Matthew 28:16-20

Celebrating Jesus’ ascension (one of our principle feasts) is hard liturgically, since most of the action happens off our stage: something like celebrating a wedding if all we were to see were the couple leaving for the church. Daniel’s dream may be the closest we get to an on-scene camera. Of the many things we might observe, here are two.

First, bottom line, our world’s future is human, not bestial. Many (most?) days that’s hard to believe in our race-to-the-bottom history. But there it is: Daniel sees something like a winged lion, then something like a bear, then something like a leopard, then something we only encounter in nightmares or the sci-fi/horror genre, but it is “one like a human being” who receives unending sovereignty.

Second, taking the chapter as a whole, we readers are often puzzled: is this “one like a human being” intended to represent an individual or a people? From the perspective of the New Testament that’s an illuminating puzzle: Jesus has so identified with his brothers and sisters (the second reading!) that his vindication and theirs are one.

The third reading. Before we succumb to the temptation to cue up “Land of Hope and Glory”, what is Jesus telling the eleven (us) to do? “Make disciples… baptizing… and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you.” “And teaching them” with us so good at obeying everything Jesus commands? Our discipling, evidence of a human future that is not bestial but humane?

Jesus, elsewhere (Matt. 19:26): “For mortals it is impossible, but for God all things are possible.” We can learn to obey while teaching others. But if only the “others” are being asked to change, that’s proselytism, not evangelism.

Re the Daily Office Readings May 20 Anno Domini 2020

The Readings: Leviticus 26:27-42; Ephesians 1:1-10; Matthew 22:41-46

(From today until Pentecost—except Ascension and Sunday—the Lectionary offers a largely course reading of Ephesians. Ephesus, on the west coast of modern Turkey, was the capital of the Roman province of Asia and among the largest cities in the Empire.)

In Lev. 26:34-35 the importance of the plural “sabbaths” (v.2) becomes clear, specifically the 7th year sabbath. That sabbath is not simply about human concerns, but also (equally?) about the land’s needs and integrity. Recalling the early chapters of Genesis (again!) Ellen Davis argues persuasively that the end of Gen. 2:15 (“The LORD God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to till it and keep it.” NRSV) might better translated with something like “to serve and to watch it,” explaining:

 “We must serve (ˁavad) the land, not worshipping it but showing it reverence as God’s own creation, respecting it as one whose needs take priority over our immediate desires. We must watch it and watch over it (shamar) as one who has something to teach us and yet at the same time needs our vigilant care” (Getting Involved with God).

The 7th year sabbath is a part of how Israel is to relate to her land, and it turns out to be like the canary in the coal mine. So (vv.34-35) the land also must receive its due. And today? At the national/international level, Creation Care is a useful starting-point. At the local level, the “Grounds” tab in the St. Dunstan’s (Madison, Wisconsin) website is an example of developing responses.

The final verses, vv.40-48, address what Israel should do after everything goes south. It is one of a cluster of Old Testament responses to the question, differing in the weight given to divine and human initiatives, differing in what the human initiatives should look like. As such, an opportunity to wonder about how we understand divine and human initiatives to interact. The cluster itself: the stage on which John the Baptist and Jesus chart their path, typically in contrast with the other paths on offer (the Pharisees, the Zealots, etc.). How can Israel’s exile be brought to a clear end?

“O God, your unfailing providence…”

“O God, your unfailing providence sustains the world we live in and the life we live: Watch over those, both night and day, who work while others sleep, and grant that we may never forget that our common life depends upon each other’s toil; through Jesus Christ our Lord” (BCP 134).

We often use this prayer in Compline. The COVID 19 pandemic casts it in an unwelcome light. Is God’s “unfailing providence” getting confused with an economy in which “essential” too often means “expendable,” whether farm laborers, cashiers, or home health workers like Kim Rockwood, profiled in this New York Times Op-Ed video posted today?

It’s a good prayer. May it kindle anger, and move us to seek effective action.

Re the Daily Office Readings May 19 Anno Domini 2020

The Readings: Leviticus 26:1-20; 1 Timothy 2:1-6; Matthew 13:18-23

Lev. 26:1-2 looks like a very condensed summary of the covenant: don’t do that (v.1); do this (v.2). We might wonder: why summarize the covenant this way? (How else could it have been summarized?)

What, for that matter, is wrong with idols, images, etc.? The answer is clear if the image is intended to point to any god except the LORD. By our numbering that’s covered in the first commandment; images per se, a separate issue (the second commandment). Different texts may point to different answers. I wonder if it doesn’t go back to Gen 1:26-27. If you want an image of God, pay attention to human beings; experience suggests that any other image leads to human beings being treated in inhuman ways.

“You shall keep my sabbaths and reverence my sanctuary.” The one organizes time (every 7th day, every 7th year, every 7x 7th year—recall Lev. 25); the other organizes space (the tabernacle/temple itself, the land of Israel, other lands; different gifts flow in different directions). How do we Christians understand the New Covenant to organize our time, our space?

Lev. 26:3-39 describes the blessings obedience brings and the curses disobedience brings, a standard element in the ancient near eastern treaties that served as a rough template for the Mosaic covenant. Among the many things we might wonder about, here are two. In vv.3-13 economic prosperity and national security are byproducts of the nation’s conduct before God. We tend to treat them as goods to be pursued directly.

Second, the whole obedience-brings-blessing-disobedience-brings-curse paradigm. On the one hand, does any part of the Bible remain intact if the paradigm is discarded? On the other hand, multiple voices within the OT warn us to use it with extreme caution. In 2 Kings righteous king Josiah dies young and wicked king Manasseh lives to a ripe old age. Job exhibits at length the disastrous results of using the paradigm diagnostically (Job is suffering, so Job is a sinner). What do we do with it?

Re the Daily Office Readings May 18 Anno Domini 2020

Waiting for Work on Edge of a Pea Field, Holtville, Imperial Valley, California by Dorothea Lange 1937

The Readings: Leviticus 25:35-55; Colossians 1:9-14; Matthew 13:1-16

Four things got my attention in the first reading; I wonder what got yours.

The prohibition against charging interest in lending (vv.35-38, present also in other OT law collections). Christians regarded the prohibition as binding until around the 16th century, then did an about-face (see, conveniently, Wikipedia). A step forward, backward, or both?

Israelites and non-Israelites: equal before the law? Within Lev. 17-26, commonly recognized by scholars as a collection with its own tradition history (the Holiness Code), there are strong affirmations of equality, e.g., 19:33-34; 24:22. Here Israel’s unique status and the principle that no Israelite lose permanently their portion of Israel’s land trumps equality: “The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants” (v.23); “For to me the people of Israel are servants; they are my servants whom I brought out from the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God” (v.55). Given the universal perspective of the opening chapters of Genesis, the tension between inclusivity and exclusivity runs throughout the Old Testament.

Slavery (still a scourge, see here and here). The laws re slavery are the parade example of the lethal danger of a decontextualized reading of Scripture, reading without attention to the larger context. The prohibition of enslaving Israelites, once “The earth is the LORD’s and all that is in it, the world, and those who live in it” (Ps. 24:1) sinks in, establishes a powerful presumption against the enslavement of anyone.

“The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants” (Lev. 25:23). What happens if we understand this as a principle and combine it with Ps 24:1 (just cited)? I think that, if we claim to be working within the Judeo-Christian tradition, it creates a powerful presumption for, minimally, a tax strategy that discourages the accumulation of wealth across generations, and public investment that minimizes income/wealth-based differences in access to goods such as education and health care. Judging by our current practice, many seem to believe that inequality can increase indefinitely without disturbing either God or public order. What do you think?

Re the Daily Office Readings May 17 Anno Domini 2020

The Readings: Leviticus 25:1-24; James 1:2-8, 16-18; Luke 12:13-21

Note: The Lectionary ends the Leviticus reading at v.17. I’ve extended the reading to v.24 to include its statement of the principle undergirding the chapter: “The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants” (v.23).

The Jubilee (vv.8ff) has received sustained attention since late in the last century as a model for dealing with third-world debt (e.g., United States Catholic Conference 1999), and at least one economist is urging it as a model for avoiding a depression in this country (Michael Hudson, here and here).

Or we could take v.23 as the starting point for meditation on our use of the words ‘my’ and ‘mine’. Here part of Letter XXI in C. S. Lewis’ imaginary correspondence from a senior to junior devil (The Screwtape Letters) may prove helpful. (We might notice that v.23 is also intimately related to the other two readings: James’ vision of everything as gift, Jesus’ assumption that the Owner can properly set limits on the actions of the tenants.)

MY DEAR WORMWOOD,

Men are not angered by mere misfortune but by misfortune conceived as injury. And the sense of injury depends on the feeling that a legitimate claim has been denied. The more claims on life, therefore, that your patient can be induced to make, the more often he will feel injured and, as a result, ill-tempered. Now you will have noticed that nothing throws him into a passion so easily as to find a tract of time which he reckoned on having at his own disposal unexpectedly taken from him. It is the unexpected visitor (when he looked forward to a quiet evening), or the friend’s talkative wife (turning up when he looked forward to a tête-à-tête with the friend), that throw him out of gear. Now he is not yet so uncharitable or slothful that these small demands on his courtesy are in themselves too much for it. They anger him because he regards his time as his own and feels that it is being stolen. You must therefore zealously guard in his mind the curious assumption “My time is my own”. Let him have the feeling that he starts each day as the lawful possessor of twenty-four hours. Let him feel as a grievous tax that portion of this property which he has to make over to his employers, and as a generous donation that further portion which he allows to religious duties. But what he must never be permitted to doubt is that the total from which these deductions have been made was, in some mysterious sense, his own personal birthright.

You have here a delicate task. The assumption which you want him to go on making is so absurd that, if once it is questioned, even we cannot find a shred of argument in its defence. The man can neither make, nor retain, one moment of time; it all comes to him by pure gift; he might as well regard the sun and moon as his chattels. He is also, in theory, committed to a total service of the Enemy; and if the Enemy appeared to him in bodily form and demanded that total service for even one day, he would not refuse. He would be greatly relieved if that one day involved nothing harder than listening to the conversation of a foolish woman; and he would be relieved almost to the pitch of disappointment if for one half-hour in that day the Enemy said “Now you may go and amuse yourself”. Now if he thinks about his assumption for a moment, even he is bound to realise that he is actually in this situation every day. When I speak of preserving this assumption in his mind, therefore, the last thing I mean you to do is to furnish him with arguments in its defence. There aren’t any. Your task is purely negative. Don’t let his thoughts come anywhere near it. Wrap a darkness about it, and in the centre of that darkness let his sense of ownership-in-Time lie silent, uninspected, and operative.

The sense of ownership in general is always to be encouraged. The humans are always putting up claims to ownership which sound equally funny in Heaven and in Hell and we must keep them doing so. Much of the modern resistance to chastity comes from men’s belief that they “own” their bodies-those vast and perilous estates, pulsating with the energy that made the worlds, in which they find themselves without their consent and from which they are ejected at the pleasure of Another! It is as if a royal child whom his father has placed, for love’s sake, in titular command of some great province, under the real rule of wise counsellors, should come to fancy he really owns the cities, the forests, and the corn, in the same way as he owns the bricks on the nursery floor.

We produce this sense of ownership not only by pride but by confusion. We teach them not to notice the different senses of the possessive pronoun-the finely graded differences that run from “my boots” through “my dog”, “my servant”, “my wife”, “my father”, “my master” and “my country”, to “my God”. They can be taught to reduce all these senses to that of “my boots”, the “my” of ownership. Even in the nursery a child can be taught to mean by “my Teddy-bear” not the old imagined recipient of affection to whom it stands in a special relation (for that is what the Enemy will teach them to mean if we are not careful) but “the bear I can pull to pieces if I like”. And at the other end of the scale, we have taught men to say “My God” in a sense not really very different from “My boots”, meaning “The God on whom I have a claim for my distinguished services and whom I exploit from the pulpit—the God I have done a corner in”.

And all the time the joke is that the word “Mine” in its fully possessive sense cannot be uttered by a human being about anything. In the long run either Our Father or the Enemy will say “Mine” of each thing that exists, and specially of each man. They will find out in the end, never fear, to whom their time, their souls, and their bodies really belong-certainly not to them, whatever happens. At present the Enemy says “Mine” of everything on the pedantic, legalistic ground that He made it: Our Father hopes in the end to say “Mine” of all things on the more realistic and dynamic ground of conquest,

Your affectionate uncle
SCREWTAPE

Re the Daily Office Readings May 16 Anno Domini 2020

From St James Episcopal Church, Goshen New York

The Readings: Leviticus 23:23-44; 2 Thessalonians 3:1-18; Matthew 7:13-21

The calendar laid out in Leviticus 23 invites reflection on our Christian calendar. Here’s another bit from Heschel’s The Sabbath, equally suggestive for us:

“Judaism is a religion of time aiming at the sanctification of time. Unlike the space-minded man to whom time is unvaried, iterative, homogeneous, to whom all hours are alike, qualitiless, empty shells, the Bible senses the diversified character of time. There are no two hours alike. Every hour is unique and the only one given at the moment, exclusive and endlessly precious.

“Judaism teaches us to be attached to holiness in time, to be attached to sacred events, to learn how to consecrate sanctuaries that emerge from the magnificent stream of a year. The Sabbaths are our great cathedrals; and our Holy of Holies is a shrine that neither the Romans nor the Germans were able to burn; a shrine that even apostasy cannot easily obliterate: the Day of Atonement. According to the ancient rabbis, it is not the observance of tile Day of Atonement, but the Day itself, the ‘essence of the Day,’ which, with man’s repentance, atones for the sins of man.”

Christmas, Epiphany, Easter, Ascension, Pentecost, Trinity, All Saints: each year we’re invited to reexperience these divine acts, and let their life-giving power bleed into the surrounding time.

When we gather together all this is visible in the changing colors on the altar and audible in the changing prayers. In this season of social distancing, where can we change the colors where we live? What other ways can we find to acknowledge and celebrate that Jesus in his flesh claimed our time, our calendars?

(P.S. Jesus claiming our calendars: that’s behind the recent change in the titles of these posts, reclaiming—and writing out in full—the old abbreviation “AD”: Anno Domini, “The Year of the Lord.” 2020 is the year of COVID 19, but that is not its primary identity.)

For more on the festivals in Leviticus 23: The Bible Journey; and Catholic Resources.