Tag Archives: Daniel

“Give to the emperor the things that are the emperor’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (October 18, AD 2026; Proper 24)

Readings

“Give therefore to the emperor the things that are the emperor’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”

That climax to our Gospel reading gives us more than enough to wonder about.

Recall the context. We’re in the middle of an extended confrontation in the temple between Jesus and various groups of religious leaders after Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem and provocative actions in the temple. Matthew tells us that here the Pharisees are seeking to entrap Jesus, so Jesus responds with what is also a booby trap.

Hearing Jesus’ response the booby (the fool) thinks: “Ah, some things are the emperor’s, other things are God’s; simple!” And in so thinking the booby shows that he (she) has learned nothing in the temple. Recall the opening of Psalm 24: “The earth is the LORD’s and all that is in it, / the world, and those who live in it.” Everything is the Lord’s.

So how can there be things that are the emperor’s? Only on loan, by the Lord’s provisional delegation. Unsurprisingly, the book in Scripture that explores this most succinctly is Daniel, the book built around the experiences of Jewish exiles in the Babylonian and Persian Empires. Early in the book, when Daniel needs the interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, he prays “Blessed be the name of God from age to age, for wisdom and power are his. He changes times and seasons, deposes kings and sets up kings; he gives wisdom to the wise and knowledge to those who have understanding” (2:20-21). Later, when Nebuchadnezzar’s arrogance has gotten the Lord’s attention, the Lord warns Nebuchadnezzar in a dream, and Daniel, after interpreting the dream, adds this: “atone for your sins with righteousness, and your iniquities with mercy to the oppressed, so that your prosperity may be prolonged” (4:27). The Lord is evenhanded: the absence of righteousness and mercy led to Jerusalem’s exile; only righteousness and mercy will allow Nebuchadnezzar to avoid disaster.

We may find this all profoundly unsettling, preferring that the divine mandate be limited to winners of clean elections. The Lord is less scrupulous, but holds all those in power to the same high standard. Psalm 82 (BCP 705-706) is perhaps clearest on this point:

1 God takes his stand in the council of heaven; *
he gives judgment in the midst of the gods:
2 “How long will you judge unjustly, *
and show favor to the wicked?
3 Save the weak and the orphan; *
defend the humble and needy;
4 Rescue the weak and the poor; *
deliver them from the power of the wicked.
5 They do not know, neither do they understand;
they go about in darkness; *
all the foundations of the earth are shaken.
6 Now I say to you, ‘You are gods, *
and all of you children of the Most High;
7 Nevertheless, you shall die like mortals, *
and fall like any prince.’”
8 Arise, O God, and rule the earth, *
for you shall take all nations for your own.

The Lord is under no illusions that the situation is stable, and so teaches us (Jews and Christians) to pray “Thy kingdom come.” That’s the short form of v.8!

Now, if the Lord has set up Nebuchadnezzar, the Lord’s people should do whatever Nebuchadnezzar says? Well, not in the book of Daniel. Daniel and his companions are part of the Babylonian and Persian civil service, but also prepared to give a firm “No” when royalty encroaches on God’s prerogatives. So we have the stories of the fiery furnace and that den of lions. Peter and John’s answer to the religious authorities early in the Book of Acts shows them to be competent readers of Daniel: “Whether it is right in God’s sight to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge” (Act 4:19).

Now, a necessary sidebar. We should probably not expect God’s people to agree on where to draw the necessary lines. Two examples. Both Ezra and Nehemiah are charged with bringing a valuable shipment from the Persian capital to Jerusalem through bandit-infested territory. Nehemiah travels with army officers and cavalry (2:9). Ezra declines this protection: “since we had told the king that the hand of our God is gracious to all who seek him, but his power and his wrath are against all who forsake him” (Ezra 8:22). Daniel and his companions judge that the royal rations of food and wine would defile, and so request vegetables and water (Dan 1:8, 12). Esther, whose intercession with the king saved the Jews from genocide, apparently shared no such scruples.

In any case, while that “No” is always on the table, the testimony of the Book of Daniel (and we might recall also Joseph in Egypt and Nehemiah in the Persian bureaucracy) is that short of this “No” God’s people can work with Nebuchadnezzar. How extensively is primarily up to Nebuchadnezzar. So roughly the first half of Daniel gives us best-case scenarios, and the second half, worst case scenarios. And the New Testament likewise gives us the full range, from Paul’s “For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Do you wish to have no fear of the authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive its approval” (Rom 13:3) to John’s “And I saw a beast rising out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads; and on its horns were ten diadems, and on its heads were blasphemous names” (Rev 13:1). They’re talking about the same Empire.

In short, “Give therefore to the emperor the things that are the emperor’s, and to God the things that are God’s” is like a koan in the Eastern wisdom traditions, a paradoxical statement to provoke insight. Everything is God’s. The emperor has some things by provisional delegation, and is accountable. God’s people are to respect that delegation, but to react when it overreaches. Always we pray “Thy kingdom come.” Always, hopefully, we remember Jesus’ “strive first for the kingdom of God and his righteousness,” (Mt 6:33), giving to the emperor insofar as that giving can be an expression of striving for God’s kingdom.

An invitation to joyful confidence and humble wisdom (25th Sunday after Pentecost, 11/17/2024)

Readings (Track 2)

Our readings from Daniel and Mark make quite a pair. The Daniel reading ends a long description of the Last Things; the Mark reading begins a long description of the Last Things. In both, all hell is breaking loose or is about to. In both, hell doesn’t get the last word. How are our innards supposed to respond? Both readings—together with the psalm and epistle—are an invitation to joyful confidence and humble wisdom. Joyful confidence and humble wisdom. Let’s see if you agree.

Psalm 16. It’s one of the Psalter’s many individual petitions. “Protect me, O God, for I take refuge in you.” The situation is lethal; the Grave and the Pit are in view. Nevertheless, the psalmist is confident in the Lord’s power and goodness, so the overriding emotion is joy, both in the present and anticipated in the future. Fear’s probably knocking (pounding?) on the door. But the psalmist doesn’t have to answer; we don’t have to answer every robocall.

So giving attention to joy’s a choice. If we pay attention, there’s joy in the present: “My boundaries enclose a pleasant land; / indeed, I have a goodly heritage.” And in the future: “And in your right hand are pleasures for evermore.” Those who’ve read C.S. Lewis’ The Screwtape Letters may recall that senior devil’s rant (“[God’s] a hedonist at heart.”[1]). In the present:

And since the other readings will get us thinking about wisdom, notice v.7: “I will bless the Lord who gives me counsel; / my heart teaches me, night after night.” Counsel, actionable wisdom, on an ongoing basis.

What the psalmist is experiencing is what we pray for in that short prayer immediately following Baptism: “Sustain them, O Lord, in your Holy Spirit. Give them an inquiring and discerning heart, the courage to will and to persevere, a spirit to know and to love you, and the gift of joy and wonder in all your works.” The psalm gives us a palpable picture of how God’s answer to that prayer can be experienced.

So, an invitation to a confidence that generates joy.

Hebrews. The psalmist’s confidence rested on the Lord’s experienced power and goodness, experienced by the psalmist and the psalmist’s community. The confidence repeatedly expressed in our Hebrews text rests on that same power and goodness at work in Jesus—as we celebrate at every Eucharist. And here the confidence generates corporate faithfulness.

Turns out our 21st century temptations aren’t all that different from 1st century temptations. “Not neglecting to meet together.” It can be a strong temptation: anything to avoid having to deal with that person. But withdrawal makes the same sense for a Christian as it does for a football player. “So you’re a football player. What team are you on?” “No team, just a football player.”

Anyhow, an invitation to the confidence that generates corporate faithfulness.

Mark. Our Mark reading starts by continuing the eyesight issue from last week. What do the disciples see when they see a scribe? What do they see watching the very different gifts of the rich and the poor widow? Even after three years with Jesus, he’s still working on their eyesight. Today, looking at the temple, the disciples are all “Ooh, Aah,” when you don’t even have to be a prophet to know that between the high taxes and the Zealots, the temple’s days are numbered. But Jesus keeps trying—as he does with us.

As the reading continues some disciples ask “Tell us, when will this be, and what will be the sign that all these things are about to be accomplished?” They want a timetable, information out there that doesn’t require any change on their part. Jesus has no interest in giving that sort of answer. His answer instead is punctuated by “Beware!” —sometimes better translated as “Watch!” or “On guard!” The future will demand wisdom, discernment. From Scripture’s perspective the only wisdom worth the name is a humble wisdom, a wisdom ever-aware of its own limits. So, in Jesus’ answer: don’t try to prepare your speech for the hostile authorities beforehand—the Holy Spirit will take care of that; don’t assume you know when the Master will return.

However we summarize Jesus’ answer (“All hell will break loose, but hell doesn’t get the last word!”), it clearly invites confidence. Equally clearly, an invitation to humble wisdom, without which that confidence will probably be counterproductive.

Daniel. The bottom line of that long description running from chapter 10 to 12: the Lord is sovereign, whether in the times of the Persians or the Greeks, whether the faithful are honored or hunted. The last verse supplies the exclamation point: “Those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the sky, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever.”

Let’s stay with that verse for a bit. That word ‘wise’ has shown up repeatedly in Daniel. It introduces Daniel and his three companions back in chapter 1; it characterizes the persecuted faithful in the days of Antiochus Epiphanes (chapter 11), whose genocidal policies sparked the Maccabean revolt. In Isaiah, it introduces the servant in the fourth “Servant Song:” “See, my servant shall prosper [be wise].” That same Song is probably responsible for the description “those who lead many to righteousness.”

“Those who are wise.” In the book of Daniel, Daniel and his companions are the paradigms of the wise. By their time, Lady Wisdom, participant in God’s creation, “delighting in the human race” (Prov. 8:31), and Moses’ Law had pretty much merged. So Daniel and his companions carefully observe Moses’ Law. Perhaps surprisingly, this frees them to give their best service to foreign kings. I think Jeremiah, who wrote “But seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile” (Jer. 29:7), would have liked that.

Jumping ahead, in a variety of ways the New Testament celebrates Jesus as the incarnation of Wisdom. Back in Proverbs, the personification of wisdom as Lady Wisdom was more than a rhetorical ornament. It captured the insight that gaining wisdom is more like getting to know a person than accumulating innumerable maxims. The incarnation seals that: if I seek wisdom, I seek to know Jesus. Not simply Jesus’ teaching or Jesus’ example—these can quickly and conveniently become abstractions—but Jesus himself, with all the open-endedness and mystery any personal relationship involves.

But talk of wisdom is dangerous, as Proverbs already recognized: “Do you see persons wise in their own eyes? There is more hope for fools than for them” (Prov. 26:12). Wisdom neglectful of its own limits is no wisdom. And I don’t escape that danger by announcing that I’m seeking to know Jesus. It’s tempting to cherry-pick the parts of Jesus I find attractive. But, for example, Jesus aligned with none of the Jewish parties: Pharisees, Sadducees, Herodians, Zealots, Qumran separatists, etc., and annoyed most of them. He cut diagonally across all of them. I would expect the same to be true of our parties today, whether political or religious. So if Jesus is not periodically annoying me, I’m probably cherry-picking.

Coming at the same issue from a different direction, it’s easy to assume that after baptism and confirmation we’ve got the basics, and it’s just a matter of—as the Hobbits would say—“filling up the corners.” The Chilean priest Segundo Galilea is closer to the truth when he writes “Let’s not assume that a Christian believes in and prays to the Christian God. There are always ambiguities and subtle idolatries in the God they adore and follow. Getting acquainted with and conversion to the God of the Gospel is a task for one’s entire life, and for everyone.”[2]

But isn’t emphasizing the limits of our wisdom a buzzkill? Recall the baptismal prayer: “the gift of joy and wonder in all your works.” When wonder, awe, even curiosity kick in, the limits of our wisdom move over into the “Win” column.

To resume, as in Mark, our Daniel text invites us to confidence (“All hell will break loose, but hell doesn’t get the last word!”) and wisdom. And here I’ve spent more time pulling back the camera to notice the importance of a wisdom that stays conscious of its limits.

And, pulling back the camera in a different direction, taking in the Book of Daniel as a whole, what that confidence and wisdom do is create a quite remarkable freedom to engage Empire. Sometimes there are happy endings: Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego; Daniel in the lion’s den. Sometimes not. In the runup to today’s text we hear “The wise among the people shall give understanding to many; for some days, however, they shall fall by sword and flame, and suffer captivity and plunder” (Dan. 11:33). It’s not that the wise (the faithful) have changed their strategy; it’s just that the choices of the powerful are sometimes wise, sometimes foolish. And that lies beyond our control, but not the Lord’s. With Daniel and Mark: the Lord bats last.


[1] Chapter 22.

[2] “No pensemos que a priori un católico cree y ora al Dios cristiano. Siempre hay ambigüedades e ‘idolatrías’ sutiles en el Dios que adora y sigue. El conocimiento y conversión al Dios del evangelio es una tarea para toda la vida y para todos” (El camino de la Espiritualidad, p.55).